![]() If you are planning on taking and/or using the spell ask your DM ahead of time what method they will take and how you can help make it easy on them. In fact, as a DM I often have the player pick the creature with an option to veto the choice. Of course, there is no reason a DM would have to run the spell this way, this just seems to be the way the designers intended. Thus, the spellcaster, under this RAI interpretation, would only be able to pick one of the 4 options and everything else (CR and specific beast) would be up to the DM. In other words, the implication is that they don't have any control over the fine details of the option they pick. The options the spellcaster chooses from are broad. ![]() The design intent for options like these is that the spellcaster chooses one of them ![]() For example, Conjure Minor Elementals offers four options. Other spells of this sort let the spellcaster choose from among several broad options. If you are reduced to 0 hit points or are incapacitated against your will, you can immediately gain the benefits of Conjure Animals as if it were cast with a. But, the SAC as quoted above does give a hint as to the intent:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |